3 players Seattle Seahawks need to get rid of this offseason
12s need to say goodbye.
The Super Bowl has wrapped up, officially marking the start of the NFL offseason. For the 31 teams that fell short of hoisting the Lombardi Trophy, now is the time to evaluate their rosters, address weaknesses, and plan for the season ahead. Tough decisions will need to be made, whether through trades, free agency, or the draft, as teams look to position themselves for success in the coming year.
The Seattle Seahawks find themselves at a crossroads, balancing a roster filled with both experienced veterans and promising young talent.
The front office must determine whether this current group is capable of competing at the highest level or if it’s time to make difficult roster moves and part ways with key players. How they navigate this offseason will have a lasting impact on the team’s future.
Three players the Seattle Seahawks should rid themselves of this offseason
Tyler Lockett
The Seahawks face one of their toughest decisions this offseason: determining whether longtime fan favorite Tyler Lockett remains part of their future plans. Lockett has been a key contributor for years, known for his reliability, leadership, and chemistry with the offense. However, as Seattle looks to retool its roster, parting ways with the veteran wide receiver may become a necessary move to create financial flexibility and address other pressing needs.
Lockett’s current contract carries a significant cap hit, which poses a challenge for a team that needs to make upgrades across multiple positions. Trading him could provide the Seahawks with much-needed cap relief, but finding a trade partner willing to take on his salary may not be easy, especially given his recent decline in production.
While his impact on and off the field has been undeniable, Seattle must weigh the emotional difficulty of moving on from a franchise staple against the long-term benefits of restructuring their roster.
Dre’Mont Jones
The Seattle Seahawks need to explore all possible options to move on from defensive lineman Dre’Mont Jones. Jones has failed to live up to expectations, struggling to make a consistent impact on the defensive front. His production has not matched the financial commitment the Seahawks made, and with salary cap concerns looming, the team cannot afford to carry an underperforming player on such a significant deal.
Finding a trade partner willing to take on Jones’ contract may be difficult, but Seattle must at least attempt to gauge interest around the league. If a trade isn’t feasible, the Seahawks may have to consider cutting their losses and finding a way to restructure or move on from him to free up cap space.
That money could be better spent reinforcing other areas of the roster, particularly in the trenches, where Seattle still needs significant upgrades.
Noah Fant
Noah Fant arrived in Seattle as part of the blockbuster trade that sent Russell Wilson to Denver, but he has yet to make the kind of impact the Seahawks had envisioned. While he has shown flashes of his athleticism, Fant has not developed into a consistent offensive weapon.
In a system that does not heavily feature tight ends in the passing game, his presence has not significantly elevated the Seahawks’ offense, making him an expendable piece as the team looks to retool.
With several roster needs and salary cap constraints, moving on from Fant would give Seattle financial flexibility to address more pressing positions. Whether through a trade or by allowing him to walk in free agency, the Seahawks would be better off using those resources elsewhere. If they choose to keep a tight end in the mix, they may look to a more cost-effective option that fits their scheme and blocking needs.
Parting ways with key players is never easy, especially for a passionate fanbase like Seattle’s, but tough decisions are necessary for long-term success. The Seahawks must prioritize building a more balanced and sustainable roster that can compete consistently, even if it means saying goodbye to familiar faces. While these moves may be difficult in the short term, they are crucial steps toward shaping a stronger, more competitive team for the future.
